Just A Utilitarian Thought - a good point!


A fellow blogger Ttony makes a good point over on Muniment Room:

The Muniment Room
.
If the father of a child is allowed no say in whether or not the child's mother aborts it or not, how can a mother who chooses not to abort demand that the father support the child financially?

It can't be "his" in any meaningful way if the primary question - life or death - is one in which he has no say and no vote.

Or am I missing something?
>
Sent with Reeder


Sent from my iPhone
Post a Comment

Popular Posts

"The King’s Speech" - a personal reaction

Being successful + serving God, or being successful vs. serving God - pt. 1

Anti-Bullying resources