Just A Utilitarian Thought - a good point!
A fellow blogger Ttony makes a good point over on Muniment Room:
The Muniment Room.
If the father of a child is allowed no say in whether or not the child's mother aborts it or not, how can a mother who chooses not to abort demand that the father support the child financially?
It can't be "his" in any meaningful way if the primary question - life or death - is one in which he has no say and no vote.
Or am I missing something?
Sent with Reeder
Sent from my iPhone